Picture This XCIX

From the ‘what were they thinking?’ files, comes this eighteenth-century Windsor chair.

geo_iii_ash__elm_comb_back_chair_c1780_02a_robert_youngPrimitive comb-back Windsor, circa 1780. (Robert Young)

The keen-of-eye might have noticed the H-stretcher’s unusual (and original) orientation which must have been the cause of many a painful Achilles tendon.

Jack Plane

About Jack Plane

Formerly from the UK, Jack is a retired antiques dealer and self-taught woodworker, now living in Australia.
This entry was posted in Antiques, Picture This and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Picture This XCIX

  1. bobbarnettpe says:

    Probably seemed like a good idea at the time. Shorty after that they discovered why it isn’t done that way.


  2. Joe M says:

    Could this have been a bad, long ago “repair”? Attaching the legs, as a sub-assembly, off by 90 degrees? If a repair or “restoration”, it would have been long ago because of the wear on the front stretcher.


    • Jack Plane says:

      The rear legs of Windsors are normally shorter than the front ones due to the downward slope of the rear of the seat. Therefore, had this been a repair and the undercarriage had been misaligned by 90°, the chair would have a noticeable list to one side.



I welcome your comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s